On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 21:37, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Hmm. I agree that this is a bug, but the proposed fix seems like a bit
> of a kluge. Wouldn't it be better to make get_last_relevant_decnum
> honor its contract, that is not delete any relevant digits?
You're right, it was a kludge.
Here's an improved version. I need to take a NUMProc* argument to do
that right, because that's how it knows how many '0's to keep from the
format.
What do you think?
Regards,
Marti
