Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marti Raudsepp
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"
Date
Msg-id CABRT9RBu=_pdUmy+VV6oDpZ8e1eg6u2oaR08WTDrze6W8ZgqwA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"  (Cédric Villemain <cedric@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"
Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Cédric Villemain
<cedric@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> a écrit :
>>Did we ever do anything about this? It looks like the thread got
>>distracted with VPATH builds and now I'm seeing this problem in 9.3.0.

> Andrew is about to commit (well...I hope) a doc patch about that and also a little fix.
> Imho this is a bugfix so I hope it will be applyed in older branches.

Oh I see, indeed commit 6697aa2bc25c83b88d6165340348a31328c35de6
"Improve support for building PGXS modules with VPATH" fixes the
problem and I see it's not present in REL9_3_0.

Andrew and others, does this seem safe enough to backport to 9.3.1?

> Apt.pgdg got the patch present in postgresql head applyed.

Erm, isn't apt.postgresql.org supposed to ship the *official*
PostgreSQL versions? Given that this issue affects all distros, I
don't see why Ubuntu/Debian need to be patched separately.

Does anyone else think this is problematic? By slipping patches into
distro-specific packages, you're confusing users (like me) and
bypassing the PostgreSQL QA process.

PS: Where are the sources used to build packages on apt.postgresql.org?

Regards,
Marti



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange hanging bug in a simple milter
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange hanging bug in a simple milter