Re: [HACKERS] rewrite HeapSatisfiesHOTAndKey - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: [HACKERS] rewrite HeapSatisfiesHOTAndKey
Date
Msg-id CABOikdPJ94fBx-n5LTqNXxRSOk8Fk=72JaH14azBpPXQ9CV3ag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] rewrite HeapSatisfiesHOTAndKey  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:

Your test and results look good, what kind of m/c you have used to
test this.

I ran it on my Macbook Pro, so nothing fancy. The code was compiled with simple ./confgure and with no special flags. The only non-default setting was shared_buffers = 512MB to ensure the table/index fits in memory.
 
  Let me see if I or one of my colleague can do this and
similar test on some high-end m/c.


Sure. That'll be helpful given a slight unexpected result. May be it's just a noise or we may see different result on a high end m/c.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
 Pavan Deolasee                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] rewrite HeapSatisfiesHOTAndKey
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication/backup defaults