On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 07/25/2011 04:07 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>
>>> I did 5-minute pgbench runs with unlogged tables and with permanent
>>> tables, restarting the database server and reinitializing the tables
>>> between each run.
>>
>> Database scale? One or multiple pgbench worker threads? A reminder on the
>> amount of RAM in the server would be helpful for interpreting the results
>> too.
>
> Ah, sorry. scale = 100, so small. pgbench invocation is:
>
It might be worthwhile to test only with the accounts and history
table and also increasing the number of statements in a transaction.
Otherwise the tiny tables can quickly become a bottleneck.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com