Re: 9.2.1 & index-only scans : abnormal heap fetches after VACUUM FULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: 9.2.1 & index-only scans : abnormal heap fetches after VACUUM FULL
Date
Msg-id CABOikdME0UyH9ATKN9y9dcWBMwo7DZdhD-_nTe5eCK1Kyt=vBw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to 9.2.1 & index-only scans : abnormal heap fetches after VACUUM FULL  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: 9.2.1 & index-only scans : abnormal heap fetches after VACUUM FULL
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 6:09 AM Josh Berkus wrote:

>>
>> Surely VACUUM FULL should rebuild the visibility map, and make tuples
>> in
>> the new relation all-visible, no?
>
> I think it cannot made all visible.
> How about if any transaction in SSI mode is started before Vacuum Full, should it see all tuples.
>

We can definitely do better than what we are doing today and that
should fix many use cases and rebuild the VM for large part of the
table if not all. More precisely, in cluster.c we can see what does
HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() returns for every tuple in a page. If there
are only DEAD or LIVE tuples in a page, we can set the VM bit. We may
need similar additional checks for LIVE tuples like we have in vacuum
code path. But its certainly doable.

I'd also suggested doing something similar for cases when a table is
created and written in the same transaction. But that's more invasive.

Thanks,
Pavan

-- 
Pavan Deolasee
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.2.1 & index-only scans : abnormal heap fetches after VACUUM FULL
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: dynamic SQL - possible performance regression in 9.2