Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way" - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Vladimir Sitnikov
Subject Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way"
Date
Msg-id CAB=Je-HtjiNJdav-6-MQngYi4V4HfZC=aHNjZPgP9Dd6gKDnjQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way"  (Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com>)
Responses Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way"  (Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Pavel>Not modifiable code is vendor-lock-in

org.osgi.enterprise jar is Apache 2.0-licensed.
Apache 2.0 allows modification of a source code. Surprise.

Pavel>I our case, it is IMO no need to test the potentially opt-outed feature,

You claim to "invent common build denominator feature", then you claim
"there's no need to test it".
Are you kidding?

As per Dave's words: "can you explain why packaging can't be tested"?
"no need" != "can't" as far as I can understand.
I think package testing should be rather simple.

Pavel> It is not needed to check in upstream
Pavel>that the opt-out feature works

You seem to ignore the main aim of testing. The tests are there to
catch unintentional changes.
If no tests added, any innocent refactoring might break your packaging script.

Vladimir


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Vitalii Tymchyshyn
Date:
Subject: Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way"
Next
From: Pavel Raiskup
Date:
Subject: Re: Complicated re-distribution of pgjdbc the "open source way"