Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Vladimir Sitnikov
Subject Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Date
Msg-id CAB=Je-Fjh3BF9O1PgxCgvqnXj=brLSqmNhNHoSk_6RPFJKjtPA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
List pgsql-jdbc
>I'm in favor of that. Even I, as a packager, almost fail all the times when I
see "9.4" there.

Glad to hear that.

I think he did not get we aim for 42.0.0.
42.0.0 is greater than 9.4.1212 if compared with maven and/or OSGi rules.

4.2.0 would indeed be a problem, so the suggestion is 42.0.0

Vladimir

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion