Re: [JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Vladimir Sitnikov
Subject Re: [JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id CAB=Je-EDO2ngb0WBjYEux6WyUFrh_f6oo0kZbHH27+VVmN7zeg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: [JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables
Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables
List pgsql-jdbc
Thomas>On 17 May 2017 at 15:42, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:
Thomas>I have updated the patch 

Thanks for the patch, however it looks a bit odd when order of 'r','p' differs from line to line.
Can you please use some consistent order for r and p?

Vladimir

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres 10 partitioned tables
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Postgres 10 partitioned tables