Re: Is anyone using db_user_namespace? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ian Lawrence Barwick
Subject Re: Is anyone using db_user_namespace?
Date
Msg-id CAB8KJ=gQFhKYELgSLoBPBt=Q9nMvdu9ccsNOVNpp18K1fo3Vkw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is anyone using db_user_namespace?  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Is anyone using db_user_namespace?
List pgsql-general
2023年7月11日(火) 2:45 Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>:
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 02:56:08PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > Over in pgsql-hackers, I've proposed removing the db_user_namespace
> > parameter in v17 [0].  I am personally not aware of anyone using this
> > parameter, but I wanted to give folks an opportunity to object in case they
> > are using it (or are aware of someone who is).
> >
> > [0] https://postgr.es/m/20230630200509.GA2830328%40nathanxps13
>
> Bumping this thread.  As long as no objections materialize, I plan to
> remove this parameter shortly.

Never used it myself; funnily enough I stumbled on it a few weeks back
and wondered if it was some nifty feature I'd overlooked, then I realized
I've stumbled across it before several times and each time promptly
forgotten about it.

Moreover a quick Google search (in quotation marks) brings up a
few pages mainly of documentation copies, configuration file snippets
happening to contain "db_user_namespace", a few mostly very non-recent
mailing list/forum questions, but nothing which screams "this feature
is used widely".

Regards

Ian Barwick



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Problematic enforcement of "ERROR: functions in index predicate must be marked IMMUTABLE"
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Problematic enforcement of "ERROR: functions in index predicate must be marked IMMUTABLE"