On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Pedro Gimeno <pgsql-004@personal.formauri.es> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote, On 2015-03-25 18:57:
>>> Hmm ... I'm thinking we probably should explicitly check for inf and NaN,
>>> no?
>
>> I agree about NaN; it worked but mostly by accident. The big number
>> detection catches infinity unambiguously. Added to a comment in the
>> attached (plus corresponding tests).
>
> I fooled around with this some more for clarity and committed it.
> Thanks for your work!
Thanks Tom for wrapping up stuff, and Pedro for the patch.
--
Michael
