Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTrrZCfw_CA6OwYXc0JAHk9QxLkxQw2-6Vb3rdmOdHQEA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>> I have spent some time looking at your patch and testing it. This
>> looks sane. A small comment that I have would be to add an assertion
>> at the top of perform_work_item to be sure that it is called in the
>> memory context of AutovacMemCxt.
>
> Done like that, thanks for reviewing!

Thanks for considering my idea.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage