On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 1:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Thinking ahead, are we going to add a new --no-objecttype switch every
>> time someone wants it?
>
> I'd personally be fine with --no-whatever for any whatever that might
> be a subsidiary property of database objects. We've got
> --no-security-labels, --no-tablespaces, --no-owner, and
> --no-privileges already, so what's wrong with --no-comments?
>
> (We've also got --no-publications; I think it's arguable whether that
> is the same kind of thing.)
And --no-subscriptions in the same bucket.
--
Michael
