Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] What's with all the fflush(stderr) calls in pg_standby.c? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] What's with all the fflush(stderr) calls in pg_standby.c?
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTqdy_dsWJ=oU=BTyv_Wfpo5STapS4Kv701wj94eAHEDw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] What's with all the fflush(stderr) calls in pg_standby.c?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] What's with all the fflush(stderr) calls inpg_standby.c?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On a related note, the idea of removing pg_standby altogether has been
> proposed a few times.  Apparently there are a few things that it still
> does better than standby_mode, but nobody seems in a hurry to do
> anything about that.  Still, I'd be against spending a lot of time
> trying to improve a tool that has mostly outlived its usefulness - we
> ought to be trying to enhance the in-core facilities instead.

+1.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Wagner
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix number skipping in to_number
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations