Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTnt1vbgZQY5kE+agi5VuJwKtmJL57NkqvprpVkOrXyuQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have been of the opinion all along that progress monitoring needs to
> report facts, not theories.  The number of tuples read thus far is a
> fact, and is fine to report for whatever value it may have to someone.
> The number of tuples that will be read in the future is a theory, and
> as you say, progress monitoring is most likely to be used in cases
> where theory and practice ended up being very different.

+1. We should never as well enter in things like trying to estimate
the amount of time remaining to finish a task [1].

[1]: https://www.xkcd.com/612/
-- 
Michael


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Anybody care about having the verbose form of the tzdata files?
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor