Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTk=TXT=rrWqG65CN1hf29bbCEBLfMneHzFaVa4Sisnkg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Yeah, it might not be bad to have tests for all the different lock types
> and make sure that the permissions match up.  I'd probably put those
> tests into 'permissions.sql' instead though.

You mean privileges.sql, right? I just wrote a patch with that. I'll
create a new thread with the patch.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Minor ON CONFLICT related fixes
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Improving regression tests to check LOCK TABLE and table permissions