Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTi2rGSO12+3Gyka3weD9wYzxniLc3WTDwbLCPu+g3RRA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Cool. I have been honestly wondering about deploying this tool as well
>> to allow some of the QE tests to perform live checks of btree indexes
>> as we use a bunch of them.
>
> I'd certainly welcome that. There are Debian packages available from
> the Github version of amcheck, which is otherwise practically
> identical to the most recent version of the patch posted here:
>
> https://github.com/petergeoghegan/amcheck

This would be packaged from source in my case, but that's no big deal
:) At least I can see that it is added in the next CF, and that's
marked as ready for committer for a couple of months now...
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive