Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: subxcnt defined as signed integer in SnapshotData and SerializeSnapshotData - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: subxcnt defined as signed integer in SnapshotData and SerializeSnapshotData
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTi+eG=NqCX5oQHbUkBa39KaGornOBs-n6ic89-cQqu6A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: subxcnt defined as signed integer in SnapshotData and SerializeSnapshotData  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: subxcnt defined as signed integer in SnapshotData and SerializeSnapshotData  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 8 May 2015 at 13:02, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I think that we should redefine subxcnt as uint32 for consistency with
>> xcnt, and remove the two assertions that 924bcf4 has introduced. I
>> could get a patch quickly done FWIW.
>
> (uint32) +1

Attached is the patch. This has finished by being far simpler than
what I thought first.
Regards,
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Async execution of postgres_fdw.
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API)