Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqThcdv+CrWyWbFQGYL0GJFZeWVGXs5K9x65WWgbqkJ7YQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, this is what I was trying to explain to Fujii-san upthread and I have
> also verified that the same works on Windows.

If you could, it would be nice as well to check that nothing breaks
with VS when using vcregress recoverycheck.
--
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add regression tests for multiple synchronous standbys.
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Detrimental performance impact of ringbuffers on performance