Re: [DOCS] pg_xlogdump -p option correction - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [DOCS] pg_xlogdump -p option correction
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqThD73UUSwOfpGdk0k36XmNGea9jLss02fbyHf7KWcSzw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] pg_xlogdump -p option correction  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [DOCS] pg_xlogdump -p option correction  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-docs
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan  8, 2017 at 03:27:59PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> >> +        subdirectory of both the current directory and the
>> >> +        <envar>PGDATA</envar> directory.
>> >> This could say "of both the current directory and *then* the PGDATA
>> >> directory" to outline the order of the actions taken by the check
>> >> routine. Just my 2c on the matter.
>> >
>> > Ah, I see your point.  I ended up rewording the text to be more explicit
>> > about the supplied argument and "searching".  Updated patch attached.
>>
>> -        Directory in which to find log segment files.  The default is to search
>> -        for them in the <literal>pg_wal</literal> subdirectory of the current
>> -        directory.
>> +        Specifies a directory in which to find log segment files.
>> +        In addition, searches are performed in the current directory,
>> +        and the <literal>pg_wal</literal> subdirectory of both the current
>> +        directory and the <envar>PGDATA</envar> directory.
>> Hm. This still misses the point that the lookup at PGDATA is done only
>> if no directory is defined. What do you think about the patch attached
>> that lists the five possible patterns: 2 for the case where a
>> directory is defined, and 3 for the default case.
>
> Understood.  Here is an updated patch which incorporates your
> suggestions.

Thanks. This looks good to me.
--
Michael


pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] pg_xlogdump -p option correction
Next
From: jitendravarshney392@gmail.com
Date:
Subject: [DOCS] idx function is not working