On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Still, it's not very clear why we need to cater for building just libpq
> rather than the whole distribution, and a user of win32.mak presumably
> has the option to do the latter. The core argument for bcc32.mak,
> I think, is that we never did support building the server with Borland C
> ... but there's no evidence that people are still building libpq with it
> either.
Indeed. Those recent reports indicate that removing win32.c would be a
bad move. So what about nuking bcc32.mak but updating win32.mak?
--
Michael
VMware vCenter Server
www.vmware.com
