Re: Confusing error message with too-large file in pg_basebackup - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Confusing error message with too-large file in pg_basebackup
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqT_ek4ezPqxd6gXWHxQW721Qf_YR+eMWvSUtawK1p=_=A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Confusing error message with too-large file in pg_basebackup  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Tom Lane  <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>wrote:

> These all seem to me to be must-fix issues even if we didn't want to
> back-port use of the base-256 convention.  Seeing that we have to deal
> with these things, I'm inclined to just back-port the whole patch to
> all branches.
>

FWIW, patch has been pushed as 00cdd83 and backpatched down to 9.1.
--
Michael

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #13782: gss auth with libpq does not include realm by default
Next
From: pinker
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump - wrong order with inheritance