Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTWY2TAa-aXxcjv3eTxCx6dVt43vBBtQXpi2vea94SYgg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 6/27/17 01:26, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I have noticed $subject. A patch is attached. Those comments are not
>> completely wrong either as pg_basebackup can generate pg_xlog as well,
>> still I would recommend to just mention "pg_wal".
>
> committed

Thanks.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Small comment fix in partition.c