Re: Review of Refactoring code for sync node detection - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Review of Refactoring code for sync node detection
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTVr2pYY9L3PJxV+sEt89rcRATsJunYTfkzwStH0DnXfA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review of Refactoring code for sync node detection  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 16 November 2014 12:07, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Let's work
>> the multiple node thing once we have a better spec of how to do it,
>> visibly using a dedicated micro-language within s_s_names.
>
> Hmm, please make sure that is a new post. That is easily something I
> could disagree with, even though I support the need for more
> functionality.
Sure. I am not really on that yet though :)
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Review of Refactoring code for sync node detection
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)