Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTUjBari5HYt6gJX7QVHT3UvOkzHqyo8yeC3-ShtCsy+Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API  (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> That's also reasonable solution, I don't really have preference between
> those. My main point was to get rid of the 5 or so variables where only one
> will actually be used in the end.

And no need to worry about the priority of the target types here. The
last value specified wins.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in 9.6 tuplesort batch memory growth logic
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.