Re: CF3+4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: CF3+4
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTUVmisYxF6y9EKu_6ZXfk6Q+5_6_5=rjjHpE4bk1uX8Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CF3+4  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: CF3+4
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
This seems sensible to me. 2012-11 is gone, whether truly finished or
not, and if everyone's OK with it I'd like to move all open work into
2013-01, close 2012-11, and open 2013-03 for post-9.3 work. That'll at
least provide a place for post-9.3 patches and consolodate everything
for somewhat easier tracking.
Is it really necessary to create a new commit fest just to move the items? Marking the patches that are considered as being too late for 9.3 should be just returned with feedback. The former patch writers, or people who want to pick up the old patches and resubmit them, will just need to move the items to the 9.4 commit fests once they are officially created.
--
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: CF3+4
Next
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen
Date:
Subject: Re: CF3+4