Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring"
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTNRrs=4adaQCoPzLtHryYt+mxroBdknTSCEx=9EyD4AQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring"  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring"  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
>>>> "Refactoring" seems rather a narrow definition of what might show up
>>>> in such a category, btw.  Maybe "Code Beautification" would be a
>>>> suitable title?  I'm bikeshedding though.
>>>
>>> I think that there is value in limiting the number of topics. But I
>>> hardly but much weight on this. Any of the above are fine.
>>
>> Can someone follow up and push this to the CF app? "Refactoring" seems
>> to be the consensus.
>
> I guess I'm wondering whether there's really enough of this to need
> its own category.

We have a category "Code comments" as well. Let's give it a shot so I
am adding it. We could always remove it later if necessary.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Request: pg_cancel_backend variant that handles 'idle in transaction' sessions
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: Add length parameterised dmetaphone functions