Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTHSzZxsSPZnW+tWjz0OiQimZ9DFDahCCrnyKKDaL-63Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> One regression failed on linux due to spacing issue which is
>> fixed in attached patch.
I just read the latest patch by curiosity, wouldn't it make more sense
to split the patch into two different patches for clarity: one for the
reclaimer worker centralized around BgMoveBuffersToFreelist and a
second for the pg_stat portion? Those seem two different features.
Regards,
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: PENDING_LIST_CLEANUP_SIZE - maximum size of GIN pending list Re: HEAD seems to generate larger WAL regarding GIN index
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots