Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqT6ybY3eaBgj=594JaOvgvpT4D_rWwhCQv8rvijsU9URw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility  (Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Sat, Dec  8, 2012 at 08:59:00AM -0500, Phil Sorber wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Bruce mentionned that pg_isready could be used directly by pg_ctl -w.
> > Default as being non-verbose would make sense. What are the other tools you
> > are thinking about? Some utilities in core?
>
> I think Bruce meant that PQPing() is used by pg_ctl -w, not that he
> would use pg_isready.

Right.
 OK cool. If you have some spare room to write a new version with verbose option as default, I'll be pleased to review it and then write it as ready for committer.
--
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: configure.in and setproctitle/optreset problem
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Makefiles don't seem to remember to rebuild everything anymore