Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqT17Ydz-_zSEO7hdoCmWC9Ywa1Lv-2u4_jWiWaC6LV=-Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for updating the patch. It looks good to me.
> BTW I'm inclined to have a regression test case where doing 'make
> check' to the streaming replication environment with
> wal_consistency_check on standby server so that we can detect a bug
> around the wal.

This would be very costly. A single run of the main regression tests
generates 15 to 20GB of FPWs if I recall correctly. Tiny buildfarm
members would suffer on that. *cough*
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Multi column range partition table
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage