On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:46 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I did not bump the extension version. I realized the migration file
>> would be empty, as there no change to SQL-level functionality (the new
>> s2k-count is parsed out of a string down in the C code). Since only
>> one version of contrib extensions binary object files are installed in
>> any given postgres installation, people using the newer binary gets
>> the feature even if they have not updated the extension version. So I
>> don't know if it makes sense to bump the version if people inherently
>> get the feature anyway.
>
> There's zero reason to bump the extension version if the SQL interface
> hasn't changed.
>
> (I have no opinion on the underlying patch.)
+1.
--
Michael
