Re: [GENERAL] RemoveIPC problem - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [GENERAL] RemoveIPC problem
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSxovHqm-u8B=aTSaoF2Takd2mU=rtg1vfEiGC=TzBBUQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] RemoveIPC problem  (scott ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] RemoveIPC problem  (scott ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 12:10 PM, scott ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I was kind of thinking that PG detects the semaphore not existing, bails immediately, restarts clean, thus no
problem.I just wanted to hear from people, like you, that know way more than I do about the internals. 

As long as you don't run Postgres on scissors with things like fsync =
off or full_page_writes = off, there should be no risk with the data
consistency.
--
Michael


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: scott ribe
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] RemoveIPC problem
Next
From: scott ribe
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] RemoveIPC problem