Re: Tracking of page changes for backup purposes. PTRACK [POC] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Tracking of page changes for backup purposes. PTRACK [POC]
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSwu2VzSajwQsMNh1S_EG1dGj+d38V1hg3vVgYLXmgXrQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Tracking of page changes for backup purposes. PTRACK [POC]  (Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova
<a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> Patches for v 10.1 and v 9.6 are attached.

Why no patch for HEAD? If you are planning to show some performance
numbers of some kind you had better run on the latest development
version, which would also avoid interference with any load bottleneck
that could have been removed during the development of v10 or v11. At
quick glance the patch proposed does not interfere with such areas.
-- 
Michael


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted.
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Tracking of page changes for backup purposes. PTRACK [POC]