Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Remove secondary checkpoint - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Remove secondary checkpoint
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSsiWaz2PSVURtsfsEfweMkoywfORyProsSyyTdXu6nYA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Remove secondary checkpoint  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> (3)
> Should we change the default value of max_wal_size from 1 GB to a smaller size?  I vote for "no" for performance.

The default has just changed in v10, so changing it again could be
confusing, so I agree with your position.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Remove secondary checkpoint
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unique index violation after pg_upgrade to PG10