Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSk3fb3ea8pGmN_L3wp3Gf38JNsduxmUj-or9iJG+i6xQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 4 March 2016 at 05:08, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Patches 0004 and 0007 remain.
>
> For readers who're not following closely that's the filtering support for
> RecursiveCopy and the support for taking filesystem-level backups in
> PostgresNode that uses it.

I am still not sure that the filter for pg_log by default is that useful but...

>> I think 0007 is uncontroversial; I
>> reworked 0004 a bit and gave it to someone else to finish a couple of
>> didn't I didn't quite like -- hopefully she'll be submitting a new
>> version soonish.  Once we have that I'm happy to push them too.
>
> Great, thanks.

No objections from here as well for the feature itself. I am glad to
see interest in extending the current infrastructure, and just
wondering what kind of tests are going to show up.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: psql autocomplete for casting
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Relation extension scalability