Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor Perl test code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor Perl test code
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSjx_F-+OY-5LKchzEq4r0=+jXhs99WWB_RySp7iGRYKg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor Perl test code  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> BTW, not the fault of this patch in particular, but this example points
>>> up the complaint I've had right along about how opaque TAP test failures
>>> are.  How did you dig down to see that error message?
>
>> Well, it showed up on my terminal...
>
> Not on mine, as per the extract I showed.  Probably a Perl version
> difference, but I don't think we can exactly write off RHEL6 as an
> uninteresting obsolete distribution.  (The Perl here is 5.10.1.)

Possible. On OSX 10.8:
$ perl --version

This is perl 5, version 16, subversion 2 (v5.16.2) built for
darwin-thread-multi-2level
(with 3 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: find_inheritance_children() and ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: broken tests