Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSjb1-==LnkdtCwwNu7ucCDuSWJT87yKQWVH+6XWJ4Zvw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)  (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Craig Ringer
<craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> We need it for tap tests. More and more will use pg_basebackup and it'll
> start hurting test speeds badly.

Ah yes, that's a good argument. hamster would suffer pretty badly
after that if nothing is done. I'll get an extra patch out for that,
with --no-sync and not --nosync by the way.
-- 
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Let file_fdw access COPY FROM PROGRAM
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)