Re: [HACKERS] coverage analysis improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] coverage analysis improvements
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSgP_DBEUF_SBBsfYmHdKkJHrVdzcjACz_JAi4xZH411Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] coverage analysis improvements  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] coverage analysis improvements  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Here is a patch series with some significant reworking and adjusting of
> how the coverage analysis tools are run.  The result should be that the
> "make coverage" runs are faster and more robust, the results are more
> accurate, and the code is simpler.  Please see the individual patches
> for details.
>
> I have replaced "make coverage-html" with "make coverage" (but kept the
> previous name for compatibility), since the old meaning of the latter
> has gone away and was never very useful.  Other than that, the usage of
> everything stays the same.
>
> I will add it to the commit fest.  Testing with different versions of
> tools would be especially valuable.

Patch 0001 fails to apply as of c629324. Which versions of lcov and
gcov did you use for your tests?
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] assorted code cleanup
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: global index