Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSdKQHFwqfKsF4-YM5HxF3Tjighb0cWO2_jdKCkMWJthw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I share your pain, but there are various things about this patch that
> make me uncomfortable. I believe we are looking for an improved design
> not just a different design.
>
> I think the best time to commit such a patch is at the beginning of a
> new cycle, so people have a chance to pick out pieces they don't like
> and incrementally propose changes.
>
> So I am going to mark this MovedToNextCF, barring objections from
> committers willing to make it happen in this release.

+1.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Next
From: Kang Yuzhe
Date:
Subject: Re: On How To Shorten the Steep Learning Curve Towards PG Hacking...