Re: pg_upgade vs config - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_upgade vs config
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSbyQwRqsEd_cW+0+Y8i0JXBNnZ-rJ8h6LuPZ-C+PhLtg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_upgade vs config  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_upgade vs config  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> It looks like we have some work to do to teach pg_dump about handling access
> methods in extensions. This doesn't look quite as bad as the first issue,
> but it's a pity 9.6 escaped into the wild with this issue.

562f06f3 has addressed this issue 3 months ago, and there is a test in
src/test/modules/test_pg_dump.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Forbid use of LF and CR characters in database and role names
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Showing parallel status in \df+