Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId?
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSbZN-o=kNCZy2LKUyiYzGPFHF7Jr7TVpFce7APd7smCg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId?
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not really; dynahash won't merge two keys just because their hash
> codes come out the same.  But you're right; that's probably not the
> best way to do it.   TBH, why do we even have pgss_hash_fn?  It seems
> like using tag_hash would be superior.

Yes, using tag_hash would be just better than any custom formula.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] datetime.h defines like PM conflict with external libraries
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] datetime.h defines like PM conflict with externallibraries