Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSaoyDsMgDX6rsFMNLDLJ_r+VBppU7GLXw0k_eDz87sWg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> On 2016-05-05 16:25:38 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> This was basically an attempt to cure a defect in 48354581a and could
>>> perhaps be lumped under that item.
>
>> It's also an independent performance improvement (sadly), and has the
>> potential for issues; so there's *some* benefits on keeping this as its
>> own entry.
>
> I left that as-is, but otherwise adopted Robert's suggestions.
> Thanks for the comments!

Are you not adding VS2015 support in those notes? Petr Jelinek is a
co-author btw, he's missing from the credits in 0fb54de.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: pg9.6 segfault using simple query (related to use fk for join estimates)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6