Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Should buffer of initialization fork have aBM_PERMANENT flag - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Should buffer of initialization fork have aBM_PERMANENT flag
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSZACCNy8FyuZBsSwsG5ZLQokNBi2+habk1onbfkQgQPQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Should buffer of initialization fork have aBM_PERMANENT flag  (Artur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Artur Zakirov
<a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> Because BM_PERMANENT is used for init forks of unlogged indexes now.

Yes, indeed.
-- 
Michael

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should we eliminate or reduce HUP from docs?
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should we eliminate or reduce HUP from docs?