On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
On 10/17/15 10:25 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > I think that we should just suggest a reverse formula of the maximum > soft limit of checkpoint_segments for max_wal_size in the release notes > of 9.5, basically: > (3 * your_old_checkpoint_segments + 1) * 16MB = max_wal_size
How about this patch?
(Actually, I'd remove the + 1 to make the numbers come out rounder.)
Removing the + 1 is fine for me.
+ been removed. Its place it taken by the new
"Its place is taken".
Other than those little things this looks fine to me.
