Re: [HACKERS] Subscription code improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Subscription code improvements
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSQmgcQq7Ve+NG2K7QxV=NWmOzP2t0HVnZVudg9gGLMhw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Subscription code improvements  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Subscription code improvements  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/8/17 05:58, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>>> Are you planning to work on remaining patches 0005 and 0006 that
>>>> improve the subscription codes in PG11 cycle? If not, I will take over
>>>> them and work on the next CF.
>>>
>>> Based on your assessment, the remaining patches were not required bug
>>> fixes.  So I think preparing them for the next commit fest would be great.
>>>
>>
>> Thank you for the comment.
>>
>> After more thought, since 0001 and 0003 patches on the first mail also
>> improve the subscription codes and are worth to be considered, I
>> picked total 4 patches up and updated them. I'm planning to work on
>> these patches in the next CF.
>>
>
> Added this item to the next commit fest.

The patch set fails to apply. Please provide a rebased version. I am
moving this entry to next CF with waiting on author as status.
-- 
Michael


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transactionid (XID)?
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] create_unique_path and GEQO