Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSOBdUFUrDwSuWbCi1uMb9rHin-TPR+A1GpU7BY4TVaiA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> I've applied these two patches now.
>
> The one that fixes the initialization backpatched to 9.3 which is the oldest
> one that has it, and the one that changes the actual 0-vs-NULL output to 9.5
> only as it's a behaviour change.

Thanks!
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Using quicksort for every external sort run
Next
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Aggregate