Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSM5TabHr7C9eCoC+znfQqvDo2cQkBGiDKV9t5uM9GQGQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am fine with an ERROR if a column list is specified without ANALYZE
> listed in the options. But that should happen as well for the case
> where only one relation is listed.

Perhaps this could be changed for 10? Changing the behavior in
back-branches looks sensitive to me.
-- 
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternativehosts when some errors occur