Re: Removing service-related code in pg_ctl for Cygwin - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Removing service-related code in pg_ctl for Cygwin
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqSKOa5uT=p2vDjkV_GTAWLD=Gr7wEC0YjE+T5w-TzB-Gg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Removing service-related code in pg_ctl for Cygwin  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/14/2016 12:38 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Beginning a new thread seems more adapted regarding $subject but
>> that's mentioned here as well:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqQXghm_SdB5iniupz1atzMxk=95gv9A8ocdo83SXCNjeg@mail.gmail.com
>>
>> It happens based on some investigation from Andrew that cygwin does
>> not need to use the service-related code, aka register/unregister
>> options or similar that are proper to WIN32 and rely instead on
>> cygrunsrv with a SYSV-like init file to manage the service. Based on
>> my tests with cygwin, I am able to see as well that a server started
>> within a cygwin session is able to persist even after it is closed,
>> which is kind of nice and I think that it is a additional reason to
>> not use the service-related code paths. Hence what about the following
>> patch, that makes cygwin behave like any *nix OS when using pg_ctl?
>> This simplifies a bit the code.
>>
>> Marco, as I think you do some packaging for Postgres in Cygwin, and
>> others, does that sound acceptable?
>>
>
>
>
> I think we can be a bit more adventurous and remove all the Cygwin-specific
> code. See attached patch, which builds fine on buildfarm cockatiel.

Ah, OK. I see the difference. It builds as well for me.

-#ifndef __CYGWIN__
-       AddUserToTokenDacl(restrictedToken);
-#endif
[...]
-#if defined(WIN32) || defined(__CYGWIN__)
+#ifdef WIN32       setvbuf(stderr, NULL, _IONBF, 0);#endif
Fine for me, those two do not seem to matter much as far as I have tested.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Combining Aggregates
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Combining Aggregates