On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I haven't tried it, but it sure looks like it would, if you don't hit
> OOM first. pqAddTuple() isn't doing anything to guard against integer
> overflow. The lack of reports implies that no one has ever tried to
> retrieve even 1G rows, let alone more ...
Yeah, looking at the code we would just need to check if ntups gets
negative (well, equal to INT_MIN) after being incremented.
--
Michael
