On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Likely it would be better to refactor all of this so we get just one
> reference to libpq and one reference to libpgport, but that'd require
> a more thoroughgoing cleanup than you have here. (Now that I think
> about it, adding -L/-l to LDFLAGS is pretty duff coding style to
> begin with --- we should be adding those things to LIBS, or at least
> putting them just before LIBS in the command lines.)
Agreed, this needs more thoughts. As that's messy, I won't high-jack
more this thread and begin a new one with a more fully-bloomed patch
once I get time to look at it.
--
Michael
