Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqS4VSUiaFnGmR2k95-RtEi++SEwZk32pMu_31VLyMpK0Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this. I agree your patch is more consistent and
> generally cleaner.

This is classified as a bug fix, and is marked as waiting on author. I
am moving it to next CF as work continues.
-- 
Michael


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] subscription worker signalling wal writer too much
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v1] Add and report the new "in_hot_standby" GUC pseudo-variable.